Yes. It’s a way to think about defense. I talked to a lacrosse coach yesterday and I think the language is probably most important. A way to think about things and communicate to help players with a shared mental model.
Yes, I believe you can apply nada to any specific defensive system.
Would it be fair to say that NADA isn’t a set of defensive tactics so much as an approach to teaching defense, ie, that you should focus on teaching players to triage based upon a set of priorities and preferred tactics rather than just drilling some platonic ideal of defense?
That you could use NADA to teach pressure man, pack line or even zone defense depending on your priorities or rules of thumb?
Yes. It’s a way to think about defense. I talked to a lacrosse coach yesterday and I think the language is probably most important. A way to think about things and communicate to help players with a shared mental model.
Yes, I believe you can apply nada to any specific defensive system.
The defensive version of SABA.
Would it be fair to say that NADA isn’t a set of defensive tactics so much as an approach to teaching defense, ie, that you should focus on teaching players to triage based upon a set of priorities and preferred tactics rather than just drilling some platonic ideal of defense?
That you could use NADA to teach pressure man, pack line or even zone defense depending on your priorities or rules of thumb?